題目性質：自編仿真題——題目、材料、選項、數據與情境均為按課程標準與聯招常見考點獨立編寫的原創仿真題，非真題原文，未取自任何題庫、教輔或試卷；解析與採分點為教研整理，非官方評分標準。
一、考點定位與做題順序
三步：① 找標誌（suggest / insist / require / demand / propose / It is time / wish / if only / if I were）→ ② 定形式（建議類一律 (should) + 動詞原形，should 可省；It is time 與 If I were 用過去式；wish 按時間層）→ ③ 回驗時間（與現在相反用過去式，與過去相反用 had done / would have done）。
一個高頻辨異：suggest 表「建議」才虛擬（We suggested that he go）；表「暗示、表明」時用陳述語氣（His tone suggested that he was annoyed），不能一律套 (should) do。下面紀要為自編示意文本，票數與人名均屬虛構。
二、逐題精講
題1
題1 六空完形（單選，每空 1 分）
自編短文：
The committee recommended that the old ledger (1) ______ digitised before June. One member insisted that the 1998 cards (2) ______ kept, though his tone suggested that he (3) ______ uneasy about the cost. The chair said, "It is high time we (4) ______ a proper index." If I (5) ______ in charge, I would have started earlier; as it was, we (6) ______ the spring deadline.
(1) A. is B. be C. was D. has been
(2) A. are B. were C. be D. had been
(3) A. be B. was C. were D. should be
(4) A. make B. made C. had made D. would make
(5) A. am B. was C. had been D. were
(6) A. met B. would have met C. had met D. would meet
補充判斷：
甲：(1) 填 should be 也正確，should 可省可不省。 乙：(3) 因主句有 suggested，必須填 should be。 丙：(5) 用 were 表示與現在事實相反，與後文 would have started 的「與過去相反」並不衝突。 丁：(6) 表示「本會趕上但沒趕上」，用 would have met。
解析
答案序列：B / C / B / B / D / B。(1) B be：recommended that… 屬建議類，賓語從句用 (should) + 動詞原形，should 省略後剩 be（被動 be digitised）。A is / C was / D has been 都是陳述式。
(2) C be：insisted that… 在此表「堅持要求」→ 同樣 (should) be kept；B were 是「與現在相反」的虛擬，不合建議類結構。注意：insist 表「堅持說（事實）」時才用陳述（He insisted that he was right），本句「要求保留」屬建議類。
(3) B was：his tone suggested that… 的 suggested 表「暗示、表明」，不虛擬，用陳述語氣；主句過去，從句相應用 was。這正是「suggest 兩義」的分界——同篇 (1) 用虛擬、(3) 用陳述，靠詞義判，不靠單詞長相。
(4) B made：It is high time (that) we made… 固定用過去式表「早該做而還沒做」；A make / C had made / D would make 都不合。
(5) D were：If I were… 與現在事實相反（我並不負責），be 動詞一律 were；主句 would have started 是與過去相反的結果，構成混合條件句（現在狀態 ↔ 過去結果），兩者可以並存。
(6) B would have met：前句 as it was（事實上當時並非如此）提示「本會趕上春季截止、實際沒趕上」，與過去相反用 would have met；A met 變陳述事實，C had met 缺主句，D would meet 是與現在/將來相反。
補充判斷：甲對（(should) be 中 should 可省，寫 should be 同樣正確）；乙錯（(3) 的 suggested 表「暗示」，用陳述 was，不能套 should be）；丙對（were＝與現在相反，would have started＝與過去相反，屬混合虛擬，不衝突）；丁對（would have met 正是「本會…但沒…」）。
答案 (1)B (2)C (3)B (4)B (5)D (6)B；補充判斷：甲對、乙錯、丙對、丁對。
採分點 六空各 1 分；建議類 (should)+原形 1 分；should 可省 1 分；insist 兩義 1 分；suggest「暗示」用陳述 1 分；It is high time + 過去式 1 分；If I were 與現在相反 1 分；混合條件句不衝突 1 分；would have met 與過去相反 1 分；四項判斷各 1 分。
易錯點 見 suggest 一律套 (should) do；把 insisted 表「要求」寫成 were；It is time 後接原形或 had done；把 If I was 當正式虛擬；把混合條件句判成前後矛盾；把 would have met 寫成 would meet；漏掉 as it was 的「與事實相反」提示。
題2
題2 改寫、wish 三層與 suggest 辨異
(1) 把 (1) 句改成保留 should 的版本，再改成用 suggest 表「暗示」且語法正確的句子，說明兩版語氣差別。(2) 用 wish 分別寫「與現在相反」「與過去相反」「對將來期盼」三句（圍繞同一件自編示意小事），寫出各自動詞形式。(3) 列出虛擬語氣形式矩陣：建議類 / It is time / If I were / wish 現在 / wish 過去 / 與過去相反主句 六類。
解析
(1)· 保留 should：The committee recommended that the old ledger should be digitised before June. —— 與省略版 be 完全等價，should 可省是建議類虛擬的特點（美式更常省，英式常留）。
· suggest 表「暗示」：The yellowed edges of the ledger suggested that it had been stored in a damp room.（或 …that it was older than the catalogue claimed.）—— 此時 suggest 不虛擬，從句按陳述語氣配合主句時態，用 was / had been，不能用 should be。
差別：前版是「要求某事被做」（尚未發生、帶主張），後版是「由跡象推出事實」（已經如此、帶推斷）；同一個詞，詞義決定語氣，這是本題最該釘死的一條。
(2) wish 三層（同一自編小事：舊索引沒趕上數字化）：
· 與現在相反：I wish the old index were still in use.（wish + 過去式；be 用 were；事實：現已不用）
· 與過去相反：I wish we had digitised the index before June.（wish + had done；事實：當時沒做）
· 對將來期盼：I wish the team would finish the new index soon.（wish + would / could + 原形；表願望、常含「但願對方肯」的語氣）
回驗：三層分別對應現在狀態 / 過去動作 / 將來意願，不可互換；把「與過去相反」寫成 wish we digitised 就降成了與現在相反。
(3) 形式矩陣：
· 建議/要求類（suggest/insist/require/demand/propose/recommend 表主張）：(should) + 動詞原形，被動用 (should) be done；
· It is (high) time：過去式（It is time we made…）；
· If I were / if only：were（與現在相反）；與過去相反用 had been；
· wish 現在：過去式 / were；
· wish 過去：had done；
· 與過去相反主句：would / could / might have done；條件從句用 had done（If we had started earlier, we would have met the deadline）。
兩條補充：① 混合條件句允許「從句與現在相反 + 主句與過去相反」（本題 (5)(6)），不判為錯誤；② as it was / otherwise / but for 常是含蓄虛擬信號，看到就往 would have done 上想。總紀律：先判詞義（主張 vs 暗示）→ 再判時間層（現在/過去/將來）→ 最後套形式，並回讀事實是否真相反。
答案 (1) …should be digitised…；暗示版 …suggested that it had been/was…（陳述、不用 should be）；差別為「要求未發生」vs「由跡象推事實」。(2) wish+過去式/were、wish+had done、wish+would+原形 三層見上。(3) 矩陣見上；補充混合條件與含蓄虛擬信號。
採分點 保留 should 版 1 分；should 可省 1 分；暗示版陳述語氣 1 分；兩版語氣差別 1 分；wish 三層各 1 分；六類矩陣 2 分；混合條件句 1 分；含蓄虛擬信號 1 分；總紀律 1 分。
易錯點 暗示版仍寫 should be；wish 與過去相反寫成過去式；wish 將來層用 had done；It is time 後接原形；把混合條件句改「統一時間」；漏看 as it was / otherwise 的含蓄虛擬；把 insist「堅持說」也套虛擬。
三、規律小結與對照表
| 標誌 | 語氣/時間層 | 形式 | 例 | 辨異 | 常見誤判 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| recommend/suggest(主張) | 要求未發生 | (should)+原形 / be done | be digitised | should 可省 | 寫成 is/was |
| insist(要求) | 要求未發生 | (should)+原形 | be kept | insist「堅持說」用陳述 | 寫成 were |
| suggest(暗示) | 推斷已如此 | 陳述 was / had been | tone suggested he was uneasy | 同詞不同義 | 套 should be |
| It is (high) time | 早該做未做 | 過去式 | we made | — | 接原形/had done |
| If I were | 與現在相反 | were | If I were in charge | be 一律 were | 寫 If I was |
| wish 現在 | 與現在相反 | 過去式 / were | wish it were… | — | 用現在式 |
| wish 過去 | 與過去相反 | had done | wish we had digitised | — | 寫成過去式 |
| wish 將來 | 期盼 | would/could+原形 | wish they would finish | — | 用 had done |
| 與過去相反主句 | 結果 | would have done | would have met | 從句 had done | 寫 would meet |
| 混合條件 | 現在↔過去 | were + would have started | 本題(5) | 允許並存 | 判成矛盾 |
| 含蓄虛擬 | as it was/otherwise | would have done | as it was, we would have met | — | 漏看信號 |
虛擬語氣只記「先判詞義，再判時間層，最後套形式」：建議類 (should)+原形（should 可省），但 suggest 表「暗示」用陳述——同篇 (1) 虛擬、(3) 陳述，靠詞義分家。It is time + 過去式、If I were、wish 三層（過去式 / had done / would+原形）、與過去相反主句 would have done 各歸各檔。混合條件句（were + would have started）允許並存，as it was / otherwise 是含蓄虛擬信號。紀要、機構與票數均為自編示意，不代表任何真實會議或記錄。
四、自測清單
- □ 先看 suggest/insist 是「主張」還是「暗示/堅稱」；
- □ 建議類用 (should)+原形，should 可省不混陳述式；
- □ It is time 與 If I were 用過去式/were；
- □ wish 按現在/過去/將來三層選形式；
- □ 與過去相反主句用 would have done；
- □ 混合條件句不判矛盾，含蓄信號回讀事實。
